Source & Citation Standards

New Remodeler is committed to providing accurate, reliable, and trustworthy information for our readers tackling home improvement and renovation projects. Our editorial standards prioritize credible sourcing to ensure the advice and data we publish are sound. This page outlines our approach to sourcing and citations.

Authoritative Sources

We rely on authoritative sources to build our content. These include government agencies such as the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) or local building departments. We also consult established industry associations like the National Association of Home Builders (NAHB) or the National Kitchen & Bath Association (NKBA). Academic research, peer-reviewed journals, and reputable trade publications with strong editorial oversight are also valued.

Citation Format

New Remodeler articles include direct in-text links to all external sources. These links allow readers to verify information immediately. We ensure the anchor text clearly describes the linked resource when the destination is not obvious. Our goal is to provide direct access to the original context of the information.

Source Verification

Before inclusion, all sources undergo a thorough verification process. Our editorial team cross-references information with multiple independent sources when possible. We review the author’s credentials, the organization’s reputation, and the publication date to confirm currency. Data related to building codes, product specifications, or safety standards receives extra scrutiny.

Primary Over Secondary Sources

We prioritize primary sources whenever possible. This includes original research, official government reports, or direct interviews with certified contractors and design professionals. Secondary sources are used cautiously; our editors strive to trace information back to its primary origin. We aim to present information from the closest point of origin.

Anonymous or Unnamed Sources

New Remodeler generally avoids anonymous or unnamed sources. In rare cases, where information is of significant public interest and cannot be obtained otherwise, we may consider such a source with explicit approval from the editor-in-chief. This requires independent verification by at least two separate sources. We will clearly explain the need for anonymity in the article itself.

Reader Verification of Sources

We encourage our readers to click on the provided in-text links to verify information for themselves. If you have questions about any cited source, please contact our editorial team. You can reach us at [email protected].

Handling Disputed Sources

If a reader disputes the accuracy or authority of a source, they should contact us immediately. Send your concerns to [email protected], providing as much detail as possible. Our editorial team will investigate the claim within five business days. We will issue a correction, clarification, or update if our investigation reveals any inaccuracies or if a source no longer meets our standards.

Last Updated: March 2026